Content

Constitution Speaker Radio Saturday

Saturday, September 3, 2011 0 comments
Read more »

American Daily Review

0 comments
Read more »

Obama Chokes On His Draconian EPA Smog Rules

0 comments
by JASmius







I guess he'd rather see American choke on dirty air than (further) imperil his evaporating re-election chances - at least until his hoped-for second Immaculation inauguration:





U.S. President Barack Obama put a stop Friday to new rules that would limit smog pollution, unexpectedly reversing course on a key policy measure after businesses argued it would kill jobs and cost them billions of dollars.



Obama said the decision to withdraw a clean-air initiative by the Environmental Protection Agency was part of an effort to reduce regulatory burdens for business.



Um, no, actually, it's part of an effort to rebuild polling numbers that have him halfway into his electoral grave already. And it's not because he's cowed by Big Business, but because his economy has gotten so bad and jobs have become such an inescapable Damocles Sword over his re-election head that he can no longer afford to just blow off the economic mass-destruction his Marxist-Alinskyist policies are designed to wreak.



Frankly, this is the first economy-related development in the past three years I've seen that actually merits use of the adverb "unexpectedly".



And when "businesses argued" that the EPA smog crackdown "would kill jobs and cost them billions," they weren't hyperbolizing:





The initial standards, proposed near the start of last year, would limit ground-level ozone, or smog. The proposal was stronger than standards set by the Bush administration in 2008, which environmentalists blasted as less aggressive than government scientists had recommended.



Under the rule, factories and oil, natural gas and power generators would be forced to cut emissions of nitrogen oxides and other chemicals called volatile organic compounds. Smog forms when those chemicals react with sunlight.



Dow Chemical has said the rule could cost as much as $90 billion. Several companies including Dow have urged the administration to delay the rule until 2013.



Interestingly enough, and not remotely coincidentally IMHO, a particular state was a central target of the EPA's regulatory blitzkrieg. See if you can guess which GOP presidential front-runner would be most in the cross-hairs:





The Energy Reliability Council of Texas on Thursday issued their impace assessment response to the EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, imposed in July, compliance demanded by January 2012.



ERCOT manages and operates the entire Texas power grid. If you haven't noticed, Texas and a good part of the central US has been gripped in the worst heat wave and drought since 1980. Six times this summer ERCOT has imposed "Level 2" restrictions as the power demand threatened to exceed the capabilities of the grid to supply, and large consumers who have established agreements with ERCOT were shut down to conserve power on those 108 degree days.



Level 3 is rolling blackouts....



ERCOT's assessment looked at three scenarios... I'll summarize them.



"Texas power producers will cut production from 2 to 8%. Period."



So here's what that means. Government imposed rolling blackouts.



Remember the governor of the last state to impose rolling blackouts on its population in the name of environmental purity? Here's a hint: He was the pathetic hack (Gray Davis) who got recalled and replaced in 2003 by some obscure nobody named....Arnold Schwartzeneggar.



Ponder that for a moment, folks: Californians, arguably the most hopelessly leftwingnut state in the country, sacked their Donk governor because he carried out the fondest dictatorial, extremist wet dreams of the greenstremist cadre, which came directly and conspicuously at their expense.



Now it's true that Texas would never be in danger of flipping "blue" under any circumstances, much less the ones that will prevail in 2012. But it wouldn't be just the Lone Star state that would be decimated by the EPA's regulatory hammer & sickle, either. Dave In Texas concludes:





I suspect the unpopularity of government imposed blackouts was a bridge too far for Obama. But it won't be if he survives the 2012 election. It'll be a feature, not a problem.



Also, why this is a big deal.



Because his policies, his directives to the EPA, hurt his re-election chances. They kill jobs. They piss people off with higher prices for energy and NO F*&IN access to energy.



Kinda harrowingly underscores what's at stake next November, doesn't it?





[cross-posted @ Hard Starboard]



Read more »

Bush Gave Credit, Obama Takes Credit

0 comments

The difference between 'class' and 'ass';





George W. Bush speech after capture of Saddam Hussein:

The success of yesterday's mission is a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq. The operation was based on the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the dictator's footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate 'them.







Barack Hussein Obama speech regarding Osama Capture Operation, Sunday, May 1, 2011:



And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as I continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network. Then, last August, after years of painstaking work by my intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan .

And finally, last week, I determined that I had enough intelligence to take action, and I authorized an operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice.

Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Read more »

Not Too Big To Sue

0 comments
by JASmius







See if you can follow the logic of this progression:



1) The Carter Regime enacts the Community Reinvestment Program to assist minorities in gaining access to home mortgage loans they allegedly wouldn't otherwise be able to obtain;



2) The Clinton Regime [Noticing a pattern here?] amends the CRP to require banks to lower their lending standards in order to guarantee minorities (and others) access to mortgages they can't afford;



3) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both packed full of Donk operatives by the Clinton Regime, both inflate the resulting "sub-prime" mortgage lending market into an ever-burgeoning speculative bubble and take those risky mortgages and securitize them, spreading that risk throughout the U.S. financial system, while being shielded from repeated Bush Administration and GOP congressional oversight attempts by Chris "Countrywide" Dodd and Barney "Slurpy" Frank.



This, in a nutshell, was the Democrat Financial Logic Bomb.



4) The DFLB ever-so-conveniently detonates, creating the Panic of 2008 and cratering the U.S. economy, seven weeks before the 2008 presidential election, while George W. Bush is still in the White House. Unsurprisingly, sixty-eight million voters, conditioned by the major media to hate Bush anyway, blame him and the GOP for the cataclysm, and elect "the other guy," Barack Hussein Obama, functionally sight unseen, also courtesy of the major media.



5) The Donk Congress, dragging along the waning lame-duck Bushies, create the Trouble Asset Relief Program, essentially monetizing the flaming wreckage and fascizing the banking sector by "encouraging" "too big to fail" banks to slurp up smaller banks with government-"provided" funding.



6) The Donk Super-Congress smothers this dramatically more concentrated financial sector in the regulatory chains of....Dodd-Frank, leaving their "too big to fail" "clients" virtually no room to breathe.



This is the most incredible, and successful, politicoeconomic conspiracy in American history, yielding a two-year reign of terror that has pushed America to the brink of collapse and, in Winston Churcill's famous turn of phrase, "the abyss of a new Dark Age".



7) And now comes the inevitable end game:







In a sweeping move, the government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.



Among the 17 targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs.



The lawsuits were filed Friday by the Federal Housing Finance Agency which oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders.



The total price tag for the securities bought by Fannie and Freddie affected by the lawsuits: $196 billion.



The government didn't provide a dollar amount of how much it seeks in damages. It said that it wants to have the purchases of the securities canceled, be compensated for lost principal and interest payments as well as attorney fees and costs. The lawsuits allege the financial firms broke federal and state laws with the sales.



Um, no; the financial firms were COMPLYING with the federal law that forced them to throw out generations of sound banking practices in the name of "social justice," while Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were spreading the resulting contagion throughout the financial sector and the larger economy beyond.



In other words, a double-cross, and punishing the victims. Not unlike a rapist whose day job is being District Attorney in charge of prosecuting rape victims as "prostitutes".



Somehow, I can't see this exercise in ideological anti-capitalist malevolence could have ended any other way.



Or maybe the Obama Regime is just pissed because their former Wall Street bankrollers have switched back to supporting the GOP. Kind of a "How dare they betray us after we double-crossed them!" dynamic.



Either way, this predatory move hardly fits with the heavily touted White House "hard pivot" to "jobs":









Bank of America might lay off up to 30,000 people in the coming years, according to a report in the Charlotte Observer.



That means it could cut over 10% of its 288,000 employees worldwide, making BofA the bank with the most brutal layoff plans we've heard yet, second only to HSBC's plans to layoff 30,000 of its 300,000 strong workforce.



Sources familiar with the firm announced the mass layoffs soon after the FHFA filed a huge lawsuit against Bank of America over $30.85 billion in losses on mortgage securities.*



The unfinalized plans are to cut over 10,000 and up to 30,000 employees in the next few years.



The reason for them is simple.



The massive cuts are partly to make up for what are expected to be huge lawsuit-related losses over the firm's and Countrywide's role in the mortgage crisis. Bank of America bough Countrywide, the country's largest mortgage lender, in 2008.



Boy, there's nothing quite like Obamunist loyalty and gratitude, huh?



I guess Red Barry will be putting all these newest pink-slip recipients to work with the shovels his regulatory capos used to bludgeon their former employers to death. How much you wanna bet that the "shovel-ready projects" to which they'll be assigned will be digging their own - and our - economic graves?









[cross-posted @ Hard Starboard]



Read more »

Liberal Agenda's Changing Ways

0 comments
Before Chris Matthews fell head over heels in love with Obama he supported Hillary Clinton during the campaign:







Of course, the devastating presidency that is Barack Obama is no surprise to conservatives. . . We Are Not Surprised That He Is The Worst President In History.



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Read more »

Character Matters

Friday, September 2, 2011 0 comments
"In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Regard not the particular sect or denomination of the candidate -- look to his character..." -- Noah Webster, Letters to a Young Gentleman Commencing His Education, 1789



I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. -- Martin Luther King, I have a Dream, 1963



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Read more »